Is Mahabharata real or not

Are Ramayan and Mahabharata Real?

This question is very difficult to answer as there are no relics from the time of the Mahabharata, but you can get an idea of ​​it if you start thinking logically. Lack of evidence does not mean lack of existence. There is also some astronomical data that suggests the Mahabharata actually happened. Now let's look at these things in detail.

Mahabharat is a " Itihas "What exclusively" so happened ”Means. A number of dynasties were also presented here. More than 50 kings from King Barhi to King Pandava have been registered. Additional information about the king, his wife, his descendants, his relatives, etc. was shown in great detail. All characters in " epos ”Are well represented. Even facets of her character and important events in her life were recorded. Not much poetic description of flora and fauna is given. Such a description in ornate language is used only in fictional works, and not when recording history.

After reading the above paragraph, let's think logically. If the Mahabharata were just fiction, few kings would have been enough to tell the story the way our modern fiction does. Why should the author give the details and names of all kings? In the Kurukshetra war, too, everyone will Flags and Symbols of the various kings mentioned. Field would not be from the author given because it would be boring for the readers. Most fictions begin with the hero, but the Mahabharata begins with the ancestor of the heroes of the epic (Pandavas). It goes back to Nagushan and Yayati. All the stories in the Mahabharata are also linked. Every story is related to some event . It is not possible for a normal human mind to imagine these types of connections unless it really happened.

Mahabharata: History or Fiction?

If there is one word for the most incredible story ever told - it is the story of the Mahabharat. There is a great deal of debate as to whether the story of Mahabharata is historically accurate. This story is so remarkable that many people have speculated about it: “Did it really happen? Let's find some answers ...

Decode the language

It was written from time to time in the epic that Mahabharat was a ” Itihas ”Is what exclusively means“ so happened ”. The words " Puraan " and " Itihas "Were specially coined by the old people in order to" old " and " new Categorize events. Both words denote the story that too different times took place Has . If the writer had the intention of writing a poem or a Novel work to write, he would have it as " Mahakavya ”Or” Katha " designated.

Records of the Bharat Dynasty

In Aadiparva , Adhyaya 62 , it is mentioned that the records of the Bharat dynasty recorded in the Mahabharata. A number of dynasties with their long line of kings ( more than 50 from Manu ) were presented in the work. If it was just fiction, 4-5 kings would have been enough to build the story.

Details of Kaliguga

Read the description of Kaliyuga, as in Mahabharata mentioned . Whatever Krishna said, it stands for a creepy , mysterious Avagat with modern life as it exists today. And remember - this was written thousands of years ago! Fiction? Unlikely because there are far too many confirmations and summaries to be fictional.

The city of Dwaraka

Marine archeology has also been used in India off the coast of the ancient port city of Dwaraka in Gujarat to find further evidence of statements in the Vedic scriptures. An entire sunken city in Dvaraka, the ancient port city of Lord Krishna with its massive fortress walls, pillars, wars and piers, was found in the ocean, as described in Mahabharata and other Vedic literatures.

We can also get evidence from archaeological research. The explorations conducted in the Gulf of Cambay revealed sandstone walls, a grid of streets, and evidence of a seaport that is 70 feet underwater. The ruins have been declared to be the remains of the legendary lost city of Dwarka, which, according to ancient Hindu texts, was the residence of the deity known as Krishna. Until recently, the existence of the city of Dwarka was a matter of legend. Now that the remains have been discovered underwater and there is plenty of evidence to suggest that this is actually the legendary dwarka who inhabited the place of Lord Krishna The legendary dwarka would be very important in understanding what the Mahabharata is. It would no longer be just a book of myths and legends, but at least to some extent a true account of past events. The excavations at Dwaraka helped to add credibility to the legend of Krishna and the Mahabharata war and to supply them. There is ample evidence of the progressive societies that lived in these areas such as the Harappan settlements. The discovery of the legendary city of Dwaraka, which is said to have been founded by Sri Krishna, is an important milestone in the history of India. It has calmed historians' doubts about the historicity of Mahabharata and the existence of the city of Dwaraka. She significantly narrowed the gap in Indian history by establishing the continuity of Indian civilization from the Vedic age to the present day.

The finds at Dwaraka and archaeological evidence found to be compatible with the Mahabharata tradition remove lingering doubts about the historicity of the Mahabharata. We would say that Krishna definitely existed . ” SR Rao (marine archaeologist)

Apart from Dwaraka, more than thirty-five sites in northern India have produced archaeological evidence and have been identified as ancient cities described in the Mahabharata. Copper utensils, iron, seals, gold and silver jewelry, terracotta discs, and painted gray ware pottery have been found in these locations.

The unfortunate fate of Dwaraka

India's NIO said in a statement: " A team of underwater archaeologists from the National Institute of Oceanography NIO has successfully 'unearthed' evidence of submerged structures off Dwaraka and has for the first time provided evidence that the Shore Temple at Dwarakai is the remnant of the series of seven such temples built one after the other were immersed.The discovery was made during a joint underwater exploration with the Scientific Exploration Society, UK . “

NIO said:

  • Underwater investigations were carried out at 5 locations in 5 - 8 m water depth 500 to 700 m in front of the Shore temple.
  • Research at each site has shown that there is stone masonry, remains of masonry, a large square rock quarry, scattered square and rectangular stone blocks, and a large platform that leads the steps to the locally occurring geological rock formations.
  • Most of the structures are badly damaged and scattered over a wide area and show biological growth from barnacles, clams, and other organisms.
  • The construction pattern and the area of ​​approximately 100 m × 50 m appear to be the same in every location. The actual area covered by ruins can extend well beyond the locations explored.
  • The possible date of the ruins can be 1500 to 1200 years BP. The Pallava dynasty, who ruled the area at this time, built many such rock and structure temples in Dwaraka, Mahabalipuram and Kanchipuram.

This Sanskrit verse from Mausala Parva 7, verse 40 des Mahabharata describes the disappearance of the city of Dwaraka in the sea. ” After all the people had left, the ocean flooded Dvaraka, which is still teeming with riches of all kinds. Whichever part of the land was flooded, the ocean immediately inundated itself with its waters .”

Ancient cities described in the Mahabharatha

More than thirty-five sites in northern India have produced archaeological evidence and have been identified as ancient cities described in the Mahabharatha. Copper utensils, iron, seals, gold and silver jewelry, terracotta discs, and painted gray ware pottery have been found in these locations. The scientific dating of these artifacts corresponds to the non-Aryan invasion model of Indian antiquity.

Similarity between Ramayana and Mahabharata

The dynasties recorded in Ramayan and Mahabharat coincide without distinction. Even the relationships between different kings and their dynasties in both great “epics” are the same. If both were mere “epics” written by two completely different people at two different times, why would everything fit together down to the smallest detail? Mahabharat is later than Ramayan. Why should the author of the Mahabharat borrow the same ideas and characters as the author of the Ramayana?

Lineage of Shri Krishna

The Greek historian Megasthenes has stated that Chandragupta Maurya was the king in the lineage of Shri Krishna. This means that Shri Krishna existed in the past era and that Mahabharat actually occurred.

Current cities of Mahbaharata

All the places mentioned in Mahabharata are real places, all are identified as real places. For example, Hastinapur is in UP. Indraprastha is today's Delhi. Dwarka is on the Gujarat coast. In addition, Mahabharata cities are not limited to present-day India as Mahabharata refers to the Indian subcontinent as Bharata. For example, Gandhar could be today's Kandhar.

In Kurukshetra, the site of the great Mahabharata War, iron arrows and spearheads were unearthed and dated 2,800 BC. Dated, the approximate date of the war given in the Mahabharata itself.

Mahabharat relates that King Bharat united various small states into one huge country called BHARAT (named after him) and made Hastinapur his capital. The name of the country ‘Bharat’ remains, which implies that there must be a truth behind the story.

Astronomical references

The Udyoga Parva of Mahabharata reports that shortly before the war, in the month of Kartika, Lord Krishna went to Hastinapur on the day the moon was at the asterism Revati. On his way to Hastinapur, Krishna rested for a day in a place called Brikasthala, and that day the moon was at the asterism Bharani. On the day Duryodhana rejected all efforts of Krishna and made war inevitable, the moon rested on the Pushya asterism.

Perfect narration of the planetary positions

Krishna left Hastinapura with Karna on the day when the moon had not yet reached the asterism Uttara Phalguni. Karna accompanied him at a distance to distract him, and then described to the Lord the positions of the planets in the sky, expressing concern that such a planetary configuration represented a very bad omen: such as great loss of life and the soaking of Blood. Vyasa narrated all of these planetary positions in up to sixteen verses as if someone were describing them after visualizing them in the sky.

Bharat Varsh

The country is called Bhaarat after King Bharat (son of Dushyant & Shakuntala). What country would be named after a novel's hero!

Hole in the Aryan theory

European scholars brought the nomadic Aryan tribes after 1500 BC. To India. How could these Aryans create the Sanskrit language, gather so much knowledge and read all these texts before 700 BC? Chr. Writing? Great Indian thinkers like Lokmanya Tilak, Sri Arbindo, and Dyanand Sarasvati rejected European theory.

Mahabharata is written in verse

It is ridiculous to say that these texts are fiction because of their poetic nature. It was customary to write everything (including mathematical formulas) in a poetic form.

Social History - Malanada Temple

There is one temple - the Malanada Temple in Edakkad Parish of Kerala Village called Poruvazhy, where Duryodhana is venerated to this day. It makes sense that Mahabharat can't just be a myth.

Duryodhana began his journey in the southern forest and eventually reached where is currently the Malanada Temple is located. He was so exhausted that he knocked on the nearby house and asked for water without realizing that the house belonged to a chief of the Shudra tribe, Kurava. An elderly woman immediately offered him a swirl to drink (a custom relating to kings), along with a combination of herbs that could alleviate his fatigue.
Refreshed, the Hastinapur Yuvraj stood up to thank the woman and, to his surprise, noticed her Mangal Sutra, which indicated her social status. According to custom, none of the Kshatriya should eat or drink anything offered by the lower classes.
In addition, it was a crime for any lower caste person to offer drinks and food to a Kshatriya. The woman feared she would be punished for her crime. However, Duryodhana surprised her with the words: " Mother, there is no caste for thirst and hunger . ”He was touched by the helping nature of women - a woman who risked her own life to help a thirsty prince.

He didn't punish her at all and, unlike others, didn't bite her.Instead, he sat in Dhyan on the nearby hill and began to worship Lord Shiva for the welfare of the Kurava tribe. He prayed that no divine wrath should be thrown on the tribesmen to feed a Kshatriya.
This surprised the villagers, who rushed to the singular high-born man who was different from all the proud upper-caste men who had severely punished them and treated them only as subordinates. Duryodhana donated 101 Yojana's land to the tribesman and announced that he would give them a temple without an idol. He insisted that the priest of the temple would only be an inviolable Kurava.

Until then, the priests of the temple without an idol are the descendants of the old woman. However, the presiding congregation is Duryodhana, and the smaller congregations include his wife Bhanumati, his mother Gandhari, and his girlfriend Karna.
The people of this village and tribe revere Duryodhana to this day ...
Source: Indiaopines

History factor not recorded

Maurya, Gupta and Indo-Greek dynasties are also recorded in our Puraanas. These dynasties are only accepted because they are also recorded by Greek historians. What about the dynasties that existed before the Greek historians?

Flying planes & nuclear war

The Indian epics, especially the MAHABHARATA, pick up the thread of the story of devastation and destruction. Sanskrit scholars could not comprehend what was described in the epics until the first atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. There are authentic verses from Mahabharata: “Gurkha, who was flying a fast and powerful vimana (fast airplane), hurled a single projectile (rocket) charged with the force of the universe (nuclear device). A glowing column of smoke and flame, as bright as ten thousand suns, rose in all its glory. "

Quote Oppenheimer

The modern atomic bomb architect who was responsible for the Manhattan project was asked by a student after the explosion in Manhattan: "How are you after the first atomic bomb exploded on earth?" Oppenheimer's answer to the question was: “Not the first atomic bomb, but the first atomic bomb of modern times”. He firmly believed that nuclear weapons were used in ancient India.

Some unanswered questions

Why did Oppenheimer believe it was a nuclear war, were the exact descriptions of the weapons used in the Mahabharata war in the epic identical to those of modern nuclear weapons? How much truth is there in the stories that claim that a region in Kurukshetra still has high levels of radioactivity?

Visit my blog -

https://www.quora.com/topic/Anin…